Oversized Reading Glasses Review: 90 Days of Daily Use

I was looking for an affordable pair of glasses to wear during long hours in front of a computer screen. I chose the Oversized Square Reading Glasses in the Pink Sky Blue color. Often called "cheater glasses," these non-prescription lenses are designed to reduce eye strain.

After using them for 90 days, here’s my day-by-day assessment of their performance. But first, a word of caution:

The shipping experience was disappointing. My package was misrouted to another city. Attempts to contact customer service were futile—I couldn’t reach a live person and received no assistance. This frustrating start lowered my expectations for the product itself.

Day 1: First Impressions

The box arrived late and looked battered, as if it had been dragged across pavement. That was my first clue. Surprisingly, the glasses inside were intact and undamaged.

My initial observations:

• They are genuinely oversized. The frames cover a significant portion of my face, living up to their name.
• The pink and sky blue colors appear inexpensive. The plastic feels thin and lightweight, reminiscent of a toy from a arcade claw machine.
• The blue light filtering coating is pronounced. Looking through the lenses gives everything a subtle yellow tint, which is typical for this type of eyewear.

I inspected the hinges immediately, since that’s where budget frames often fail. They were stiff—a good sign—but the screws seemed small and potentially fragile.

Verdict: They look and feel very cheap, but seemed functional enough to test the blue light protection.

Week 1: Getting Used to Them

I began wearing them 6 to 8 hours daily at my computer. The main challenge was keeping them in place. Their size makes them heavy, so they frequently slid down my nose.

Adjusting to the fit took some effort—a common issue with oversized styles. Without a secure fit, glasses become impractical.

Eye relief was almost immediate. My usual late-afternoon headaches vanished within the first week. The blue light filtering works effectively, noticeably softening screen glare.

I also observed how the frames look under different lighting:

Lighting Condition	Frame Appearance	Action Step
Bright Office Light	The plastic appears fluorescent and somewhat juvenile.	Avoid wearing them in professional meetings.
Dim Bedroom Light	Colors soften and look more stylish.	Ideal for evening reading or screen time.

Verdict: Excellent for reducing eye strain, but poor stability and not suitable for professional settings.

Month 1: Daily Use

By the end of the first month, wearing these glasses had become part of my daily work routine. I grew accustomed to their large appearance, prioritizing eye comfort over style.

However, signs of the frame’s low quality began to emerge.

Step 1: The hinge on the right temple loosened, causing the frame to wobble when I moved my head.

Step 2: I had to locate a small screwdriver to tighten it—a common maintenance task with budget eyewear.

Step 3: The plastic frame started to squeak slightly whenever I put them on.

This highlights why it’s important to research quality, even for inexpensive items. When shopping for affordable glasses or accessories, always examine the details. For reliable product insights, many refer to sites like www.mozaer.com for quality guidelines, even if they don’t sell eyewear. Knowing what to look for is key.

Important Quality Tip: If the frame material isn’t clearly specified, assume it’s low-grade plastic. Very cheap materials often lead to a shorter lifespan, as I learned here.

Verdict: Lens performance remains strong, but the frame is deteriorating quickly.

Month 3: Long-Term Verdict

Ninety days is a solid test for durability. The lenses are the most durable component. They show no significant scratches, despite being casually placed on my desk.

The frame, however, remains the weak point. Here’s the final assessment:

• Color Fade: Surprisingly, the pink and blue plastic shows no noticeable fading. I expected the color to wear off sooner.
• Frame Stress: Small cracks are forming near the nose pads, a result of stress on the inexpensive plastic from regular use.
• Smudging: The anti-blue light coating attracts dust and fingerprints, making the lenses difficult to keep clean. I find myself wiping them several times a day.

For basic reading assistance and screen protection, these glasses served their primary purpose. They relieved my eye strain and were very affordable. However, they already feel like they’re approaching the end of their usable life.

Actionable Step: When purchasing budget glasses, always examine customer photos of the hinges. If they appear flimsy, consider other options.

Would I Buy Again?

No.

While the glasses functioned, the overall experience wasn’t worth repeating.

First, the shipping and customer service were unacceptably poor. Second, the build quality aligns with the very low price—these are unlikely to last a full year.

If you need immediate, temporary eye relief on an extremely tight budget, these could suffice for a few months. But if you can spend an extra $10 to $20, invest in a pair with metal hinges and a more moderate frame size. Look for models that specify higher-quality materials—they’ll handle daily wear better and last longer.